Nonprofit Youth Development CFO Salary in Oregon

Official IRS Form 990 Schedule J compensation benchmarks for CFO positions across youth development 501(c)(3) nonprofits in Oregon (with annual budgets between $5M – $10M). Based on 26 matched filings for IRS § 4958 safe harbor compliance.

25th Percentile
$113,124
Lower Bound
Median (50th %)
$127,197
Market Consensus
75th Percentile
$153,587
Safe Harbor Ceiling
Matched Peer Group
26 Filings
IRS Verified Peers
Filter Peer Group
Empirical Market Analysis · Oregon
Census Division: Pacific

At $127,197, the median CFO compensation for Oregon nonprofits in the $5M – $10M operating band sits 29.5% below the national benchmark ($180,420), reflecting regional cost-of-labor variations in the Pacific division. Matched peer filings establish an interquartile safe harbor range between $113,124 (25th percentile) and $153,587 (75th percentile).

Across this 26-organization peer group, median executive remuneration accounts for 2% of total organizational operating expenditures (interquartile peer range: 1% – 2%). Base salary represents an average of 85% of total compensation, with performance incentives reported by 100% of reporting institutions (averaging $6,772 among participating organizations).

Interquartile Safe Harbor Distribution

Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6(c)(2) Rebuttable Presumption Bandwidth

26 Verified Filings
P10$105,495
P25 (Safe Min)$113,124
Median (50th)$127,197
P75 (Safe Max)$153,587
P90$172,147
Legal Precedent: To secure the IRS Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness, tax-exempt governing boards must establish that approved compensation falls within market comparability bounds prior to voting. Compensation between the 25th and 75th percentiles ($113,124 – $153,587) represents the defensible interquartile standard accepted by federal regulators.

Schedule J Pay-Mix Distribution

Average component allocation across Form 990 Part VII Section A & Schedule J Part II extracts

26 Matched Filings
Base Salary
$115,119
85% of total remuneration
Bonus & Incentive
$6,772
100% peer participation
Deferred Comp
$6,772
100% peer participation
Nontaxable Benefits
$6,772
100% peer coverage
Sample Size26 Matched Filings
Average Budget$8,015,624
Pay-to-Budget Ratio2% (1%–2%)
IRS Filing Vintage2022–2025 XML Extracts

Matched Form 990 Peer Organizations

Sample peer group entries matched by budget, NTEE taxonomy, and geographic cost-of-labor

Showing 3 of 26 peers
THE BOYS & GIRLS AID SOCIETY OF OREGON
EIN: 930386791 • Metro Area, OR • Budget: $8,075,527
$1••,•••
Schedule J Locked
JOYFUL NOISE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
EIN: 931119163 • Metro Area, OR • Budget: $6,519,112
$1••,•••
Schedule J Locked
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND
EIN: 931098105 • Metro Area, OR • Budget: $8,564,454
$1••,•••
Schedule J Locked

Access All 26 Matched Peer Filings

Generate the full, audit-ready 8-page Board Compliance Packet including individual peer line-item disclosures (Base, Bonus, Deferred, Benefits), statutory citations, and turnkey board minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical salary for a CFO at a Oregon nonprofit with $5M – $10M?

Based on 26 verified IRS Form 990 Schedule J filings in Oregon, the median total compensation for a CFO is $127,197. The 25th percentile sits at $113,124 and the 75th percentile (the rebuttable safe harbor ceiling) is $153,587.

How does Oregon CFO pay compare to national averages?

At $127,197, median CFO compensation in Oregon is 29.5% lower than the national baseline ($180,420) for comparable operating budgets, consistent with economic indices in the Pacific division.

What percentage of operating budget should a 501(c)(3) spend on its CFO?

Across matched peer filings for $5M – $10M nonprofits, median CFO compensation represents 2% of total organizational operating expenses. The middle 50% of peer institutions allocate between 1% and 2% of expenditures to executive leadership.

How does Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6 protect board members approving executive compensation?

Under Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6, tax-exempt governing boards secure the Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness when they rely on independent comparability data from similarly situated peer organizations prior to voting and record the decision contemporaneously in their minutes. Once established, the legal burden shifts to the IRS to prove that compensation was excessive.