Nonprofit Youth Development CFO Salary in Iowa

Official IRS Form 990 Schedule J compensation benchmarks for CFO positions across youth development 501(c)(3) nonprofits in Iowa (with annual budgets between $50M – $100M). Based on 25 matched filings for IRS § 4958 safe harbor compliance.

25th Percentile
$279,124
Lower Bound
Median (50th %)
$299,677
Market Consensus
75th Percentile
$334,182
Safe Harbor Ceiling
Matched Peer Group
25 Filings
IRS Verified Peers
Filter Peer Group
Empirical Market Analysis · Iowa
Census Division: West North Central

At $299,677, the median CFO compensation for Iowa nonprofits in the $50M – $100M operating band sits 24.2% below the national benchmark ($395,250), reflecting regional cost-of-labor variations in the West North Central division. Matched peer filings establish an interquartile safe harbor range between $279,124 (25th percentile) and $334,182 (75th percentile).

Across this 25-organization peer group, median executive remuneration accounts for 1% of total organizational operating expenditures (interquartile peer range: 0% – 1%). Base salary represents an average of 85% of total compensation, with performance incentives reported by 100% of reporting institutions (averaging $15,430 among participating organizations).

Interquartile Safe Harbor Distribution

Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6(c)(2) Rebuttable Presumption Bandwidth

25 Verified Filings
P10$261,901
P25 (Safe Min)$279,124
Median (50th)$299,677
P75 (Safe Max)$334,182
P90$355,865
Legal Precedent: To secure the IRS Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness, tax-exempt governing boards must establish that approved compensation falls within market comparability bounds prior to voting. Compensation between the 25th and 75th percentiles ($279,124 – $334,182) represents the defensible interquartile standard accepted by federal regulators.

Schedule J Pay-Mix Distribution

Average component allocation across Form 990 Part VII Section A & Schedule J Part II extracts

25 Matched Filings
Base Salary
$262,317
85% of total remuneration
Bonus & Incentive
$15,430
100% peer participation
Deferred Comp
$15,430
100% peer participation
Nontaxable Benefits
$15,430
100% peer coverage
Sample Size25 Matched Filings
Average Budget$62,284,952
Pay-to-Budget Ratio1% (0%–1%)
IRS Filing Vintage2022–2025 XML Extracts

Matched Form 990 Peer Organizations

Sample peer group entries matched by budget, NTEE taxonomy, and geographic cost-of-labor

Showing 3 of 25 peers
HATTIE LARLHAM CENTER FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES
EIN: 340963865 • Metro Area, OH • Budget: $75,198,257
$3••,•••
Schedule J Locked
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
EIN: 411601449 • Metro Area, MN • Budget: $74,099,697
$3••,•••
Schedule J Locked
CHILDRENS PHYSICIANS
EIN: 470689372 • Metro Area, NE • Budget: $73,675,253
$3••,•••
Schedule J Locked

Access All 25 Matched Peer Filings

Generate the full, audit-ready 8-page Board Compliance Packet including individual peer line-item disclosures (Base, Bonus, Deferred, Benefits), statutory citations, and turnkey board minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical salary for a CFO at a Iowa nonprofit with $50M – $100M?

Based on 25 verified IRS Form 990 Schedule J filings in Iowa, the median total compensation for a CFO is $299,677. The 25th percentile sits at $279,124 and the 75th percentile (the rebuttable safe harbor ceiling) is $334,182.

How does Iowa CFO pay compare to national averages?

At $299,677, median CFO compensation in Iowa is 24.2% lower than the national baseline ($395,250) for comparable operating budgets, consistent with economic indices in the West North Central division.

What percentage of operating budget should a 501(c)(3) spend on its CFO?

Across matched peer filings for $50M – $100M nonprofits, median CFO compensation represents 1% of total organizational operating expenses. The middle 50% of peer institutions allocate between 0% and 1% of expenditures to executive leadership.

How does Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6 protect board members approving executive compensation?

Under Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6, tax-exempt governing boards secure the Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness when they rely on independent comparability data from similarly situated peer organizations prior to voting and record the decision contemporaneously in their minutes. Once established, the legal burden shifts to the IRS to prove that compensation was excessive.