Nonprofit Human Services CEO Salary in Alaska

Official IRS Form 990 Schedule J compensation benchmarks for CEO positions across human services 501(c)(3) nonprofits in Alaska (with annual budgets between $10M – $25M). Based on 30 matched filings for IRS § 4958 safe harbor compliance.

25th Percentile
$193,889
Lower Bound
Median (50th %)
$216,202
Market Consensus
75th Percentile
$237,508
Safe Harbor Ceiling
Matched Peer Group
30 Filings
IRS Verified Peers
Filter Peer Group
Empirical Market Analysis · Alaska
Census Division: Pacific

At $216,202, the median CEO compensation for Alaska nonprofits in the $10M – $25M operating band sits 25.3% below the national benchmark ($289,520), reflecting regional cost-of-labor variations in the Pacific division. Matched peer filings establish an interquartile safe harbor range between $193,889 (25th percentile) and $237,508 (75th percentile).

Across this 30-organization peer group, median executive remuneration accounts for 2% of total organizational operating expenditures (interquartile peer range: 1% – 2%). Base salary represents an average of 81% of total compensation, with performance incentives reported by 100% of reporting institutions (averaging $15,559 among participating organizations).

Interquartile Safe Harbor Distribution

Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6(c)(2) Rebuttable Presumption Bandwidth

30 Verified Filings
P10$175,256
P25 (Safe Min)$193,889
Median (50th)$216,202
P75 (Safe Max)$237,508
P90$271,219
Legal Precedent: To secure the IRS Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness, tax-exempt governing boards must establish that approved compensation falls within market comparability bounds prior to voting. Compensation between the 25th and 75th percentiles ($193,889 – $237,508) represents the defensible interquartile standard accepted by federal regulators.

Schedule J Pay-Mix Distribution

Average component allocation across Form 990 Part VII Section A & Schedule J Part II extracts

30 Matched Filings
Base Salary
$180,037
81% of total remuneration
Bonus & Incentive
$15,559
100% peer participation
Deferred Comp
$13,336
100% peer participation
Nontaxable Benefits
$8,891
100% peer coverage
Sample Size30 Matched Filings
Average Budget$14,755,413
Pay-to-Budget Ratio2% (1%–2%)
IRS Filing Vintage2022–2025 XML Extracts

Matched Form 990 Peer Organizations

Sample peer group entries matched by budget, NTEE taxonomy, and geographic cost-of-labor

Showing 3 of 30 peers
Assets Inc
EIN: 920076696 • Metro Area, AK • Budget: $14,896,262
$2••,•••
Schedule J Locked
Eastern Aleutian Tribes Inc
EIN: 920139107 • Metro Area, AK • Budget: $14,450,689
$2••,•••
Schedule J Locked
FAMILY CENTERED SERVICES OF ALASKA
EIN: 920129771 • Metro Area, AK • Budget: $15,572,319
$2••,•••
Schedule J Locked

Access All 30 Matched Peer Filings

Generate the full, audit-ready 8-page Board Compliance Packet including individual peer line-item disclosures (Base, Bonus, Deferred, Benefits), statutory citations, and turnkey board minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical salary for a CEO at a Alaska nonprofit with $10M – $25M?

Based on 30 verified IRS Form 990 Schedule J filings in Alaska, the median total compensation for a CEO is $216,202. The 25th percentile sits at $193,889 and the 75th percentile (the rebuttable safe harbor ceiling) is $237,508.

How does Alaska CEO pay compare to national averages?

At $216,202, median CEO compensation in Alaska is 25.3% lower than the national baseline ($289,520) for comparable operating budgets, consistent with economic indices in the Pacific division.

What percentage of operating budget should a 501(c)(3) spend on its CEO?

Across matched peer filings for $10M – $25M nonprofits, median CEO compensation represents 2% of total organizational operating expenses. The middle 50% of peer institutions allocate between 1% and 2% of expenditures to executive leadership.

How does Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6 protect board members approving executive compensation?

Under Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6, tax-exempt governing boards secure the Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness when they rely on independent comparability data from similarly situated peer organizations prior to voting and record the decision contemporaneously in their minutes. Once established, the legal burden shifts to the IRS to prove that compensation was excessive.