Nonprofit Healthcare CEO Salary in Arizona

Official IRS Form 990 Schedule J compensation benchmarks for CEO positions across healthcare 501(c)(3) nonprofits in Arizona (with annual budgets between $50M – $100M). Based on 25 matched filings for IRS § 4958 safe harbor compliance.

25th Percentile
$365,113
Lower Bound
Median (50th %)
$411,513
Market Consensus
75th Percentile
$464,259
Safe Harbor Ceiling
Matched Peer Group
25 Filings
IRS Verified Peers
Filter Peer Group
Empirical Market Analysis · Arizona
Census Division: Mountain

At $411,513, the median CEO compensation for Arizona nonprofits in the $50M – $100M operating band sits 33.8% below the national benchmark ($621,300), reflecting regional cost-of-labor variations in the Mountain division. Matched peer filings establish an interquartile safe harbor range between $365,113 (25th percentile) and $464,259 (75th percentile).

Across this 25-organization peer group, median executive remuneration accounts for 1% of total organizational operating expenditures (interquartile peer range: 1% – 1%). Base salary represents an average of 81% of total compensation, with performance incentives reported by 100% of reporting institutions (averaging $29,355 among participating organizations).

Interquartile Safe Harbor Distribution

Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6(c)(2) Rebuttable Presumption Bandwidth

25 Verified Filings
P10$329,017
P25 (Safe Min)$365,113
Median (50th)$411,513
P75 (Safe Max)$464,259
P90$505,157
Legal Precedent: To secure the IRS Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness, tax-exempt governing boards must establish that approved compensation falls within market comparability bounds prior to voting. Compensation between the 25th and 75th percentiles ($365,113 – $464,259) represents the defensible interquartile standard accepted by federal regulators.

Schedule J Pay-Mix Distribution

Average component allocation across Form 990 Part VII Section A & Schedule J Part II extracts

25 Matched Filings
Base Salary
$339,679
81% of total remuneration
Bonus & Incentive
$29,355
100% peer participation
Deferred Comp
$25,161
100% peer participation
Nontaxable Benefits
$16,774
100% peer coverage
Sample Size25 Matched Filings
Average Budget$73,302,611
Pay-to-Budget Ratio1% (1%–1%)
IRS Filing Vintage2022–2025 XML Extracts

Matched Form 990 Peer Organizations

Sample peer group entries matched by budget, NTEE taxonomy, and geographic cost-of-labor

Showing 3 of 25 peers
BISBEE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC
EIN: 860334996 • Metro Area, AZ • Budget: $73,914,793
$4••,•••
Schedule J Locked
COPA HEALTH INC
EIN: 844608444 • Metro Area, AZ • Budget: $77,511,246
$4••,•••
Schedule J Locked
SUN LIFE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC
EIN: 860296211 • Metro Area, AZ • Budget: $71,908,546
$4••,•••
Schedule J Locked

Access All 25 Matched Peer Filings

Generate the full, audit-ready 8-page Board Compliance Packet including individual peer line-item disclosures (Base, Bonus, Deferred, Benefits), statutory citations, and turnkey board minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical salary for a CEO at a Arizona nonprofit with $50M – $100M?

Based on 25 verified IRS Form 990 Schedule J filings in Arizona, the median total compensation for a CEO is $411,513. The 25th percentile sits at $365,113 and the 75th percentile (the rebuttable safe harbor ceiling) is $464,259.

How does Arizona CEO pay compare to national averages?

At $411,513, median CEO compensation in Arizona is 33.8% lower than the national baseline ($621,300) for comparable operating budgets, consistent with economic indices in the Mountain division.

What percentage of operating budget should a 501(c)(3) spend on its CEO?

Across matched peer filings for $50M – $100M nonprofits, median CEO compensation represents 1% of total organizational operating expenses. The middle 50% of peer institutions allocate between 1% and 1% of expenditures to executive leadership.

How does Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6 protect board members approving executive compensation?

Under Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6, tax-exempt governing boards secure the Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness when they rely on independent comparability data from similarly situated peer organizations prior to voting and record the decision contemporaneously in their minutes. Once established, the legal burden shifts to the IRS to prove that compensation was excessive.