Nonprofit Community Development CEO Salary in Alaska

Official IRS Form 990 Schedule J compensation benchmarks for CEO positions across community development 501(c)(3) nonprofits in Alaska (with annual budgets between Under $1M). Based on 28 matched filings for IRS § 4958 safe harbor compliance.

25th Percentile
$53,444
Lower Bound
Median (50th %)
$61,836
Market Consensus
75th Percentile
$67,189
Safe Harbor Ceiling
Matched Peer Group
28 Filings
IRS Verified Peers
Filter Peer Group
Empirical Market Analysis · Alaska
Census Division: Pacific

At $61,836, the median CEO compensation for Alaska nonprofits in the Under $1M operating band sits 41.8% below the national benchmark ($106,330), reflecting regional cost-of-labor variations in the Pacific division. Matched peer filings establish an interquartile safe harbor range between $53,444 (25th percentile) and $67,189 (75th percentile).

Across this 28-organization peer group, median executive remuneration accounts for 11% of total organizational operating expenditures (interquartile peer range: 10% – 14%). Base salary represents an average of 81% of total compensation, with performance incentives reported by 0% of reporting institutions (averaging $0 among participating organizations).

Interquartile Safe Harbor Distribution

Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6(c)(2) Rebuttable Presumption Bandwidth

28 Verified Filings
P10$49,006
P25 (Safe Min)$53,444
Median (50th)$61,836
P75 (Safe Max)$67,189
P90$73,868
Legal Precedent: To secure the IRS Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness, tax-exempt governing boards must establish that approved compensation falls within market comparability bounds prior to voting. Compensation between the 25th and 75th percentiles ($53,444 – $67,189) represents the defensible interquartile standard accepted by federal regulators.

Schedule J Pay-Mix Distribution

Average component allocation across Form 990 Part VII Section A & Schedule J Part II extracts

28 Matched Filings
Base Salary
$49,771
81% of total remuneration
Bonus & Incentive
$0
0% peer participation
Deferred Comp
$3,687
100% peer participation
Nontaxable Benefits
$6,759
100% peer coverage
Sample Size28 Matched Filings
Average Budget$565,674
Pay-to-Budget Ratio11% (10%–14%)
IRS Filing Vintage2022–2025 XML Extracts

Matched Form 990 Peer Organizations

Sample peer group entries matched by budget, NTEE taxonomy, and geographic cost-of-labor

Showing 3 of 28 peers
GLOBAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION
EIN: 200286383 • Metro Area, AK • Budget: $580,052
$•••,•••
Schedule J Locked
THE TED STEVENS FOUNDATION FKA NORTH TO THE FUTURE FOUNDATION
EIN: 920172512 • Metro Area, AK • Budget: $577,427
$•••,•••
Schedule J Locked
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST ALASKA
EIN: 920103202 • Metro Area, AK • Budget: $624,416
$•••,•••
Schedule J Locked

Access All 28 Matched Peer Filings

Generate the full, audit-ready 8-page Board Compliance Packet including individual peer line-item disclosures (Base, Bonus, Deferred, Benefits), statutory citations, and turnkey board minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical salary for a CEO at a Alaska nonprofit with Under $1M?

Based on 28 verified IRS Form 990 Schedule J filings in Alaska, the median total compensation for a CEO is $61,836. The 25th percentile sits at $53,444 and the 75th percentile (the rebuttable safe harbor ceiling) is $67,189.

How does Alaska CEO pay compare to national averages?

At $61,836, median CEO compensation in Alaska is 41.8% lower than the national baseline ($106,330) for comparable operating budgets, consistent with economic indices in the Pacific division.

What percentage of operating budget should a 501(c)(3) spend on its CEO?

Across matched peer filings for Under $1M nonprofits, median CEO compensation represents 11% of total organizational operating expenses. The middle 50% of peer institutions allocate between 10% and 14% of expenditures to executive leadership.

How does Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6 protect board members approving executive compensation?

Under Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6, tax-exempt governing boards secure the Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness when they rely on independent comparability data from similarly situated peer organizations prior to voting and record the decision contemporaneously in their minutes. Once established, the legal burden shifts to the IRS to prove that compensation was excessive.