Nonprofit Arts & Culture CEO Salary in Vermont

Official IRS Form 990 Schedule J compensation benchmarks for CEO positions across arts & culture 501(c)(3) nonprofits in Vermont (with annual budgets between Under $1M). Based on 31 matched filings for IRS § 4958 safe harbor compliance.

25th Percentile
$53,824
Lower Bound
Median (50th %)
$60,119
Market Consensus
75th Percentile
$71,080
Safe Harbor Ceiling
Matched Peer Group
31 Filings
IRS Verified Peers
Filter Peer Group
Empirical Market Analysis · Vermont
Census Division: New England

At $60,119, the median CEO compensation for Vermont nonprofits in the Under $1M operating band sits 41.7% below the national benchmark ($103,075), reflecting regional cost-of-labor variations in the New England division. Matched peer filings establish an interquartile safe harbor range between $53,824 (25th percentile) and $71,080 (75th percentile).

Across this 31-organization peer group, median executive remuneration accounts for 12% of total organizational operating expenditures (interquartile peer range: 9% – 14%). Base salary represents an average of 81% of total compensation, with performance incentives reported by 0% of reporting institutions (averaging $0 among participating organizations).

Interquartile Safe Harbor Distribution

Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6(c)(2) Rebuttable Presumption Bandwidth

31 Verified Filings
P10$49,465
P25 (Safe Min)$53,824
Median (50th)$60,119
P75 (Safe Max)$71,080
P90$78,034
Legal Precedent: To secure the IRS Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness, tax-exempt governing boards must establish that approved compensation falls within market comparability bounds prior to voting. Compensation between the 25th and 75th percentiles ($53,824 – $71,080) represents the defensible interquartile standard accepted by federal regulators.

Schedule J Pay-Mix Distribution

Average component allocation across Form 990 Part VII Section A & Schedule J Part II extracts

31 Matched Filings
Base Salary
$50,645
81% of total remuneration
Bonus & Incentive
$0
0% peer participation
Deferred Comp
$3,752
100% peer participation
Nontaxable Benefits
$6,878
100% peer coverage
Sample Size31 Matched Filings
Average Budget$597,433
Pay-to-Budget Ratio12% (9%–14%)
IRS Filing Vintage2022–2024 XML Extracts

Matched Form 990 Peer Organizations

Sample peer group entries matched by budget, NTEE taxonomy, and geographic cost-of-labor

Showing 3 of 31 peers
PARTNERSHIPS FOR LITERACY AND LEARNING
EIN: 814001184 • Metro Area, VT • Budget: $599,642
$•••,•••
Schedule J Locked
NEXT STAGE ARTS PROJECT INC
EIN: 452157212 • Metro Area, VT • Budget: $586,624
$•••,•••
Schedule J Locked
WONDERFEET KIDS MUSEUM INC
EIN: 454692194 • Metro Area, VT • Budget: $585,956
$•••,•••
Schedule J Locked

Access All 31 Matched Peer Filings

Generate the full, audit-ready 8-page Board Compliance Packet including individual peer line-item disclosures (Base, Bonus, Deferred, Benefits), statutory citations, and turnkey board minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical salary for a CEO at a Vermont nonprofit with Under $1M?

Based on 31 verified IRS Form 990 Schedule J filings in Vermont, the median total compensation for a CEO is $60,119. The 25th percentile sits at $53,824 and the 75th percentile (the rebuttable safe harbor ceiling) is $71,080.

How does Vermont CEO pay compare to national averages?

At $60,119, median CEO compensation in Vermont is 41.7% lower than the national baseline ($103,075) for comparable operating budgets, consistent with economic indices in the New England division.

What percentage of operating budget should a 501(c)(3) spend on its CEO?

Across matched peer filings for Under $1M nonprofits, median CEO compensation represents 12% of total organizational operating expenses. The middle 50% of peer institutions allocate between 9% and 14% of expenditures to executive leadership.

How does Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6 protect board members approving executive compensation?

Under Treasury Regulation § 53.4958-6, tax-exempt governing boards secure the Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness when they rely on independent comparability data from similarly situated peer organizations prior to voting and record the decision contemporaneously in their minutes. Once established, the legal burden shifts to the IRS to prove that compensation was excessive.